animal: has feel similar to human

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
has feel similar to human 1.00
work for human be 0.81
has feel 0.80
sense fear in human 0.80
be defined as only animal that have hair 0.77
has almost no understand 0.77
has feel too 0.76
has strong sense 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(animal, has feel similar to human)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(animal, has feel similar to human)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(animal, has feel similar to human)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(animal, work for human be)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(animal, work for human be)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(animal, sense fear in human)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(animal, has feel too)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(animal, has feel too)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(animal, sense fear in human)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, work for human be)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(animal, sense fear in human)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(animal, sense fear in human)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(animal, has feel too)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(animal, has feel too)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(animal, work for human be)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(animal, has feel similar to human)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(animal, has feel similar to human)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(animal, has feel similar to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)