animal: work for human be

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
work for human be 1.00
has feel similar to human 0.81
hunt human 0.80
sense fear in human 0.78
be defined as only animal that have hair 0.77
has live body while computer do not 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(animal, work for human be)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(animal, work for human be)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(animal, work for human be)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(animal, hunt human)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(animal, has feel similar to human)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(animal, sense fear in human)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(animal, hunt human)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(animal, hunt human)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(animal, has feel similar to human)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(animal, sense fear in human)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(animal, has feel similar to human)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(animal, sense fear in human)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(animal, hunt human)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(animal, sense fear in human)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(animal, has feel similar to human)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, work for human be)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(animal, work for human be)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(animal, work for human be) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(mammal, be defined as only animal that have hair)