animal: have spotted fur

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, living thing
Weight: 0.62
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
have spotted fur 1.00
have white fur 0.86
have fur 0.86
be with fur 0.86
be with white fur 0.86
wear fur 0.85
be with thick fur 0.83
have coats of fur 0.83
be covered in fur 0.82
be covered with fur 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have spotted fur)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(mammal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(mammal, have fur)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(llama, have fur)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(mammal, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, have spotted fur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(llama, have fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(llama, have fur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, have spotted fur)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, have fur)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, have fur)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have fur)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be covered in fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be covered in fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be covered in fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be covered in fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(animal, be covered with fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, be covered with fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, be covered with fur)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, be covered with fur)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have spotted fur)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, have spotted fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(llama, have fur)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(animal, have spotted fur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mammal, have fur)