animal: live long

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
live long 1.00
live 0.89
wants to live 0.85
live life 0.84
live underground 0.75
has live body while computer do not 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cougar, live)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(cougar, live)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(cougar, live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(animal, live long)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(animal, wants to live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(animal, live)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(animal, live)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(animal, live life)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(animal, live)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(animal, live)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(animal, live life)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(animal, live underground)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(animal, wants to live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(animal, wants to live)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(animal, live underground)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(animal, live life)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(animal, wants to live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(animal, live underground)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(animal, live life)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(animal, live underground)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(animal, has live body while computer do not)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, live long)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, live long)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(animal, live long)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(cougar, live)