animation: be in west associated with children

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in west associated with children 1.00
be in west associated 0.93
be in west 0.82
be located in certain areas 0.75
be related 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(industry, be located in certain areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animation, be in west associated with children)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(industry, be located in certain areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(industry, be located in certain areas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(industry, be located in certain areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(animation, be in west associated with children)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(photography, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(animation, be in west associated with children)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(animation, be in west associated)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animation, be in west associated)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animation, be in west)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(animation, be in west associated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(animation, be in west)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(animation, be in west associated)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(animation, be in west)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(animation, be in west)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(animation, be in west associated with children)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animation, be in west associated with children)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(industry, be located in certain areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photography, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(animation, be in west associated with children) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(industry, be located in certain areas)