ant: grow wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings dung beetle
Weight: 0.37
, housefly
Weight: 0.36
, scorpion
Weight: 0.36
, gypsy moth
Weight: 0.36
, lizard
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
grow wings 1.00
has physical part wings 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ant, grow wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(ant, grow wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(ant, grow wings)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ant, has physical part wings)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ant, has physical part wings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(ant, has physical part wings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ant, has physical part wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ant, grow wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(ant, grow wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(ant, grow wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)