insect: has physical part wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.66
, wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, biological agent
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.78
, housefly
Weight: 0.77
, aphid
Weight: 0.73
, ladybug
Weight: 0.73
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part wings 1.00
get wings 0.90
has physical part eyes 0.81
has physical part exoskeletons 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has physical part wings)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ladybug, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(ladybug, has physical part wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(insect, has physical part wings)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(insect, get wings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(insect, get wings)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(insect, get wings)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(insect, get wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ladybug, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(insect, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)