insect: get wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.66
, wild animal
Weight: 0.65
, biological agent
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.78
, housefly
Weight: 0.77
, aphid
Weight: 0.73
, ladybug
Weight: 0.73
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
get wings 1.00
has physical part wings 0.90
fly without tail 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ladybug, has physical part wings)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(aphid, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ladybug, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(ladybug, has physical part wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(insect, get wings)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(insect, has physical part wings)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(insect, get wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(insect, get wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aphid, has physical part wings)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(insect, get wings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(ladybug, has physical part wings)