invertebrate: has physical part exoskeletons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organism
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.53
, creature
Weight: 0.51
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, group
Weight: 0.47
Siblings octopus
Weight: 0.71
, earthworm
Weight: 0.67
, arthropod
Weight: 0.67
, hermit crab
Weight: 0.66
, insect
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part exoskeletons 1.00
has physical part legs 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(insect, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(invertebrate, has physical part legs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part legs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(invertebrate, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part legs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)