arthropod: has physical part exoskeletons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.67
, organism
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.55
, parasite
Weight: 0.49
Siblings centipede
Weight: 0.68
, arachnid
Weight: 0.57
, insect
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part exoskeletons 1.00
be with exoskeletons 0.96
has physical part exoskeleton 0.88
need hard exoskeleton 0.83
shed exoskeleton 0.82
have jointed exoskeleton 0.81
molt exoskeleton 0.80
has physical part antennae 0.76
has physical part bodies 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(arthropod, be with exoskeletons)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, be with exoskeletons)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, shed exoskeleton)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(arthropod, be with exoskeletons)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeleton)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeleton)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, need hard exoskeleton)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeleton)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, have jointed exoskeleton)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part bodies)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part antennae)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(arthropod, be with exoskeletons)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part antennae)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(arthropod, has physical part antennae)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, molt exoskeleton)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(arthropod, molt exoskeleton)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(arthropod, has physical part antennae)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(arthropod, has physical part bodies)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arthropod, has physical part bodies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeleton)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part bodies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(arthropod, molt exoskeleton)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(arthropod, have jointed exoskeleton)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(arthropod, have jointed exoskeleton)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(arthropod, molt exoskeleton)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(arthropod, shed exoskeleton)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(arthropod, have jointed exoskeleton)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(arthropod, need hard exoskeleton)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(arthropod, need hard exoskeleton)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(arthropod, shed exoskeleton)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(arthropod, need hard exoskeleton)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(arthropod, shed exoskeleton)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)