arthropod: has physical part bodies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents invertebrate
Weight: 0.67
, organism
Weight: 0.58
, animal
Weight: 0.55
, parasite
Weight: 0.49
Siblings centipede
Weight: 0.68
, arachnid
Weight: 0.57
, insect
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part bodies 1.00
have segmented bodies 0.76
has physical part exoskeletons 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part bodies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(arthropod, has physical part bodies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(insect, has physical part exoskeletons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(arthropod, has physical part bodies)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(arthropod, have segmented bodies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(arthropod, have segmented bodies)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(arthropod, have segmented bodies)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, have segmented bodies)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(arthropod, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part bodies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arthropod, has physical part bodies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part exoskeletons)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(arthropod, has physical part bodies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(invertebrate, has physical part exoskeletons)