antarctica: affect animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.59
, continent
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
, place
Weight: 0.55
, territory
Weight: 0.53
Siblings equatorial guinea
Weight: 0.33
, niger
Weight: 0.33
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.33
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, montana
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect animals 1.00
have animals 0.91
be important to animals 0.91
affect people 0.83
have decreasing around antarctica animals 0.81
be important to polar animals 0.79
be important for humans 0.77
has wildlife 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(territory, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(antarctica, affect animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(territory, be important to animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(territory, be important to animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(territory, be important to animals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(antarctica, affect animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(antarctica, affect animals)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, be important to animals)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, have animals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, affect people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, has wildlife)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(antarctica, have animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(antarctica, has wildlife)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(antarctica, have animals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(antarctica, be important to animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(antarctica, have animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(antarctica, affect people)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(antarctica, has wildlife)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(antarctica, has wildlife)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(antarctica, affect people)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(antarctica, be important to animals)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(antarctica, affect people)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(antarctica, be important to animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, affect animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(antarctica, affect animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(territory, be important to animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(antarctica, affect animals)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(territory, be important to animals)