apartment: be expensive in dallas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents house
Weight: 0.63
, space
Weight: 0.63
, bedroom
Weight: 0.63
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.68
, ground floor
Weight: 0.65
, townhouse
Weight: 0.54
, duplex
Weight: 0.50
, high rise
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in dallas 1.00
be expensive in miami 0.86
be expensive in california 0.81
be in nyc 0.80
be in boston 0.79
is nyc 0.79
be expensive in bangkok 0.79
be expensive in new york 0.79
live in america like 0.77
be in japan 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, be in boston)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(hotel room, be in boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(hotel room, be in boston)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(apartment, be in boston)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(apartment, be in boston)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in boston)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in california)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(apartment, be expensive in california)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in japan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(apartment, be in japan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(apartment, be in japan)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in miami)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apartment, be in boston)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(apartment, be in japan)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in california)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in new york)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be in nyc)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(apartment, be in nyc)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(apartment, be in nyc)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(apartment, is nyc)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(apartment, is nyc)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(apartment, be in nyc)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(apartment, is nyc)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(apartment, is nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(apartment, be expensive in dallas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apartment, be expensive in dallas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(hotel room, be in boston)