apocalypse: is now good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents film
Weight: 0.63
, movie
Weight: 0.59
, book
Weight: 0.56
, armageddon
Weight: 0.53
Siblings zombie
Weight: 0.58
, horror movie
Weight: 0.34
, monster
Weight: 0.32
, devil
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is now good 1.00
is now good movie 0.85
is now weird 0.85
has quality good 0.83
is now popular 0.82
is kree 0.78
get big 0.77
is hard 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apocalypse, is now good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(book, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apocalypse, is now good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apocalypse, is now good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(film, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(book, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(book, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(film, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(movie, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(movie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(apocalypse, is now good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(book, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(apocalypse, is now good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(film, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(apocalypse, is now good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(apocalypse, is now good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(apocalypse, is now good movie)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(apocalypse, is now good movie)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good movie)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(apocalypse, is now good movie)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(apocalypse, is now popular)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(apocalypse, is now good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(book, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(film, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(book, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(apocalypse, is now good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(movie, has quality good)