appeal: be important in advertising

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, claim
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
Siblings action
Weight: 0.58
, pathos
Weight: 0.39
, judgment
Weight: 0.32
, attraction
Weight: 0.31
, matter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in advertising 1.00
be effective in advertising 0.94
be important to marketers 0.80
be important in business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(appeal, be important in advertising)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(appeal, be important in advertising)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(attribute, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(attribute, be important in business)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(appeal, be important in advertising)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(attribute, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(appeal, be important in advertising)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(appeal, be important in advertising)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be effective in advertising)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(appeal, be effective in advertising)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(appeal, be effective in advertising)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(appeal, be effective in advertising)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be important to marketers)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(appeal, be important to marketers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(appeal, be important to marketers)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(appeal, be important to marketers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(appeal, be important in advertising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(attribute, be important in business)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(appeal, be important in advertising) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)