appeal: be important to marketers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, claim
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.58
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
Siblings action
Weight: 0.58
, pathos
Weight: 0.39
, judgment
Weight: 0.32
, attraction
Weight: 0.31
, matter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to marketers 1.00
be important in advertising 0.80
be effective in advertising 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(appeal, be important to marketers)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be important in advertising)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be effective in advertising)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(appeal, be important in advertising)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(appeal, be effective in advertising)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(appeal, be important in advertising)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(appeal, be important in advertising)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(appeal, be effective in advertising)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(appeal, be effective in advertising)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(appeal, be important to marketers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(appeal, be important to marketers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(appeal, be important to marketers)