apple juice: be cheap in relation to cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents juice
Weight: 0.79
, drink
Weight: 0.74
, fruit
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, soft drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings tomato juice
Weight: 0.43
, carrot juice
Weight: 0.42
, grape juice
Weight: 0.42
, lemon juice
Weight: 0.42
, lime juice
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheap in relation to cost 1.00
be cheap in relation 0.95
be cheap in relation to cost of apples 0.92
is cheap 0.84
is cheaper 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soft drink, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(soft drink, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, is cheap)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, is cheap)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(food, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(soft drink, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost of apples)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(apple juice, is cheap)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(apple juice, is cheap)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(apple juice, is cheaper)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is cheap)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, is cheaper)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is cheaper)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is cheap)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is cheaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soft drink, is cheap)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soft drink, is cheap)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(apple juice, be cheap in relation to cost) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, is cheap)