application: be soft wares

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, method
Weight: 0.63
, contact
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings search engine
Weight: 0.68
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, attachment
Weight: 0.67
, authorization
Weight: 0.66
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be soft wares 1.00
be soft wares written 0.96
be wares 0.94
be wares written 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(application, be soft wares)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(application, be wares)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(application, be soft wares written)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(application, be wares)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(application, be wares written)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(application, be wares)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(application, be wares written)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(application, be wares written)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(application, be soft wares written)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(application, be soft wares written)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(application, be soft wares written)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(application, be wares written)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(application, be wares)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, be soft wares)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(application, be soft wares) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(application, be soft wares)