application: be wares written

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, method
Weight: 0.63
, contact
Weight: 0.62
, element
Weight: 0.62
Siblings search engine
Weight: 0.68
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, attachment
Weight: 0.67
, authorization
Weight: 0.66
, hearing aid
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be wares written 1.00
be wares 0.95
be soft wares written 0.95
be soft wares 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(application, be wares written)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(application, be wares)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(application, be wares)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(application, be soft wares written)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(application, be soft wares written)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(application, be soft wares)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(application, be wares)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(application, be soft wares)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(application, be wares)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(application, be soft wares written)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(application, be soft wares)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(application, be soft wares)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(application, be soft wares written)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(application, be wares written)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(application, be wares written)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(application, be wares written)