appointment: be to supreme court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents step
Weight: 0.67
, application
Weight: 0.62
, date
Weight: 0.59
, commitment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings doctor office
Weight: 0.62
, board
Weight: 0.62
, hospital visit
Weight: 0.60
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, ortho
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to supreme court 1.00
be to supreme court important 0.99
be made to supreme court 0.98
be to court 0.90
be to court important 0.88
be made to court 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(appointment, be to supreme court)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to supreme court)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(appointment, be to court)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(appointment, be made to supreme court)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(appointment, be made to court)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(appointment, be made to court)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(appointment, be made to supreme court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(appointment, be made to court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(appointment, be to court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(appointment, be made to supreme court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(appointment, be to court)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be to supreme court important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(appointment, be to supreme court important)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(appointment, be to court important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to court)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be to court)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be to court important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(appointment, be to supreme court important)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(appointment, be to supreme court important)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(appointment, be to court important)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(appointment, be to court important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be to supreme court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(appointment, be to supreme court)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(appointment, be to supreme court)