appointment: be made to court

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents step
Weight: 0.67
, application
Weight: 0.62
, date
Weight: 0.59
, commitment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings doctor office
Weight: 0.62
, board
Weight: 0.62
, hospital visit
Weight: 0.60
, chairperson
Weight: 0.52
, ortho
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made to court 1.00
be to court 0.95
be to court important 0.93
be made to supreme court 0.91
be to supreme court 0.85
be to supreme court important 0.85
be made 0.80
were made 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(date, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(appointment, be made to court)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(date, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(date, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(board, be made)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(date, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(appointment, be made to court)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(board, be made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(board, be made)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(board, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(board, were made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(appointment, be made to court)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(appointment, be to court)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to supreme court)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(appointment, be made to supreme court)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(appointment, be to court)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be to supreme court)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(appointment, be made to court)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(date, were made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(board, be made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(board, were made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(appointment, be made to court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(date, were made)