board: were made

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents committee
Weight: 0.63
, chess board
Weight: 0.63
, appointment
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
Siblings panel
Weight: 0.64
, at
Weight: 0.53
, arb
Weight: 0.38
, council
Weight: 0.36
, commission
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
were made 1.00
was made 0.93
be made 0.93
is made 0.91
were created 0.77
be made to court 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(department, was made)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(board, were made)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(committee, were created)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(board, were made)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appointment, be made to court)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(board, were made)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(appointment, be made to court)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(department, was made)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(committee, were created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(appointment, be made to court)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(department, was made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(committee, were created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panel, be made)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(panel, is made)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(department, was made)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(board, were made)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(committee, were created)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(board, were made)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(appointment, be made to court)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(board, were made)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(panel, is made)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(panel, is made)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panel, be made)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(panel, be made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(board, were made)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(board, be made)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(board, be made)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(board, be made)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(board, be made)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(board, were created)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(board, were created)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(board, were created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(board, were created)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(board, were made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(department, was made)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(appointment, be made to court)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(committee, were created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(panel, is made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(panel, be made)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(department, was made)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(appointment, be made to court)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(board, were made)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(committee, were created)