appraiser: value property efficiently

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents real estate agent
Weight: 0.60
, expert
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.55
, property
Weight: 0.54
, real estate
Weight: 0.54
Siblings appraisal
Weight: 0.34
, realtor
Weight: 0.34
, auditor
Weight: 0.33
, geologist
Weight: 0.33
, lawyer
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
value property efficiently 1.00
value house 0.82
increase in value 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(appraiser, value property efficiently)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(real estate, increase in value)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(real estate, increase in value)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(real estate, increase in value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(appraiser, value property efficiently)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(appraiser, value property efficiently)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(appraiser, value house)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(appraiser, value house)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(appraiser, value house)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(appraiser, value house)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(appraiser, value property efficiently)

Typical implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(appraiser, value property efficiently)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(real estate, increase in value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(appraiser, value property efficiently) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(real estate, increase in value)