arch: hurt bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.68
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, pattern
Weight: 0.56
, site
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dome
Weight: 0.34
, pyramid
Weight: 0.34
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.34
, skyscraper
Weight: 0.33
, helix
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
hurt bad 1.00
hurt 0.95
hurt running 0.86
supports hurt 0.77
has quality bad 0.77
is damaging 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arch, hurt bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arch, hurt bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pattern, is damaging)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arch, hurt bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(site, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(pattern, is damaging)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(pattern, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(pattern, is damaging)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(site, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(pattern, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(site, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(pattern, is damaging)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(arch, hurt bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(arch, hurt bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt running)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(arch, hurt running)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(arch, hurt running)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arch, hurt running)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(arch, hurt)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(arch, hurt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(arch, hurt)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(arch, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arch, supports hurt)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(arch, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(arch, supports hurt)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(arch, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(arch, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(arch, supports hurt)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(arch, supports hurt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(arch, hurt bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pattern, is damaging)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(site, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(pattern, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(arch, hurt bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(pattern, is damaging)