archaeologist: study

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.66
, expert
Weight: 0.62
, researcher
Weight: 0.59
, scholar
Weight: 0.58
, writer
Weight: 0.54
Siblings archeologist
Weight: 0.38
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, biologist
Weight: 0.36
, astronomer
Weight: 0.36
, geneticist
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
study 1.00
be important in study 0.94
study past 0.89
be important in study of history 0.86
study lives 0.86
continue study 0.86
study soil 0.83
study achaeological records 0.83
study records 0.83
study lives of people 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(biologist, study)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(biologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biologist, study)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(archaeologist, study)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study past)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, be important in study of history)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study achaeological records)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(archaeologist, study past)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(archaeologist, study past)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(archaeologist, study)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeologist, study) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(biologist, study)