archaeology: be important for history

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.57
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.29
, baseball field
Weight: 0.28
, living thing
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for history 1.00
be important to history 0.99
be important in world history 0.95
be important for early history 0.95
be important in ancient world history 0.89
be important to study of history 0.89
be important today 0.78
be important for historians 0.77
be considered historical science 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important for history)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important to history)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important to history)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important to history)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important in world history)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important for early history)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important in world history)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important for early history)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important in ancient world history)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important in world history)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important to study of history)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important for early history)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important to study of history)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important in ancient world history)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important to study of history)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important in ancient world history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important for early history)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important today)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important in world history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important for historians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important to history)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important today)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important today)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important for historians)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important for historians)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important in ancient world history)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important to study of history)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important for historians)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important today)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important for history)