archaeology: be considered historical science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.57
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.29
, baseball field
Weight: 0.28
, living thing
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered historical science 1.00
be considered science 0.88
is science 0.82
is social science 0.81
be important for historians 0.77
be important in ancient world history 0.77
be considered time dimension of anthropology 0.76
be considered scientific discipline 0.76
be important to historians 0.76
be important for history 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, is science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(archaeology, is social science)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(archaeology, is social science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(archaeology, is science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, is science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(archaeology, is social science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important for historians)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important in ancient world history)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important to historians)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important for history)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is social science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important to historians)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important for historians)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important in ancient world history)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important for history)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important to historians)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important to historians)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important for historians)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important in ancient world history)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important for history)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important for historians)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important in ancient world history)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important for history)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science)