archaeology: be considered science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.57
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.29
, baseball field
Weight: 0.28
, living thing
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered science 1.00
is science 0.93
be considered historical science 0.88
is social science 0.86
be considered scientific discipline 0.81
be considered time dimension of anthropology 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered science)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, is science)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(archaeology, is social science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is social science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(archaeology, is science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(archaeology, is social science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(archaeology, is social science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered science)