archaeology: is science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.57
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.29
, baseball field
Weight: 0.28
, living thing
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is science 1.00
be considered science 0.93
is social science 0.91
be considered historical science 0.82
be important to anthropology 0.76
be considered scientific discipline 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, is science)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered science)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(archaeology, is social science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is social science)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(archaeology, is social science)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important to anthropology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(archaeology, is social science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered scientific discipline)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important to anthropology)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important to anthropology)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important to anthropology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(archaeology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, is science)