archaeology: is social science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.57
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.29
, baseball field
Weight: 0.28
, living thing
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
is social science 1.00
is science 0.91
is social 0.89
be considered science 0.86
be considered historical science 0.81
be important to anthropology 0.76
be considered time dimension of anthropology 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(archaeology, is social science)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is science)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, is science)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is social)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered science)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(archaeology, is social)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important to anthropology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(archaeology, is science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, is science)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(archaeology, is social)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered science)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(archaeology, is social)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important to anthropology)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important to anthropology)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important to anthropology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is social science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(archaeology, is social science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(archaeology, is social science)