archaeology: be considered time dimension of anthropology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field
Weight: 0.57
, discipline
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, subject
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings football field
Weight: 0.29
, baseball field
Weight: 0.28
, living thing
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered time dimension of anthropology 1.00
be important to anthropology 0.90
be considered time dimension 0.87
be considered science 0.77
be considered historical science 0.76
is social science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be important to anthropology)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered science)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(archaeology, is social science)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, is social science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(archaeology, is social science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(archaeology, is social science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(archaeology, be important to anthropology)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered historical science)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(archaeology, be important to anthropology)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(archaeology, be important to anthropology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(archaeology, be considered time dimension of anthropology)