architect: benefit from pythagorean theorem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
benefit from pythagorean theorem 1.00
use pythagorean theorem 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use pythagorean theorem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(engineer, use pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(engineer, use pythagorean theorem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(architect, use pythagorean theorem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(architect, use pythagorean theorem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(architect, use pythagorean theorem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(architect, use pythagorean theorem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(architect, benefit from pythagorean theorem) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(engineer, use pythagorean theorem)