architect: need insurance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
need insurance 1.00
need professional indemnity insurance 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(architect, need insurance)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(architect, need insurance)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(contractor, need insurance)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(contractor, need insurance)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(builder, need insurance)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(architect, need insurance)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(architect, need insurance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(builder, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(builder, need insurance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(architect, need insurance)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, need professional indemnity insurance)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(architect, need professional indemnity insurance)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(architect, need professional indemnity insurance)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(architect, need professional indemnity insurance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(architect, need insurance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(architect, need insurance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(contractor, need insurance)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(builder, need insurance)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(contractor, need insurance)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(architect, need insurance) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance)