contractor: need insurance

Related concepts

Parents	construction worker Weight: 0.70 , workman Weight: 0.63 , professional Weight: 0.61 , employee Weight: 0.61
Siblings	architect Weight: 0.71 , engineer Weight: 0.65 , builder Weight: 0.63 , plumber Weight: 0.63 , agent Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
need insurance	1.00
need indemnity insurance	0.90
have a for liability insurance	0.89
need professional indemnity insurance	0.88
need pollution insurance	0.88
pay employers insurance	0.87
have a for general liability insurance	0.87
pay employers national insurance	0.87
have a down year for liability insurance	0.87
have a down year for general liability insurance	0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Remarkable(architect, need professional indemnity insurance)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(architect, need insurance)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(builder, need insurance)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(builder, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(builder, need insurance)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(architect, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(architect, need insurance)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

Remarkable(architect, need professional indemnity insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(architect, need professional indemnity insurance)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Salient(contractor, need insurance)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need indemnity insurance)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay employers insurance)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(contractor, pay employers national insurance)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need pollution insurance)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(contractor, have a for liability insurance)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(contractor, have a down year for liability insurance)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(contractor, have a down year for general liability insurance)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(contractor, have a for general liability insurance)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(contractor, need indemnity insurance)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(contractor, pay employers insurance)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(contractor, need pollution insurance)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(contractor, pay employers national insurance)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(contractor, need indemnity insurance)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(contractor, need pollution insurance)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(contractor, pay employers insurance)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(contractor, have a down year for liability insurance)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(contractor, pay employers national insurance)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(contractor, have a for liability insurance)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(contractor, need pollution insurance)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(contractor, have a for general liability insurance)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(contractor, have a down year for general liability insurance)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(contractor, have a down year for liability insurance)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(contractor, need indemnity insurance)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(contractor, pay employers insurance)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(contractor, have a for general liability insurance)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(contractor, have a for liability insurance)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(contractor, pay employers national insurance)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(contractor, have a down year for general liability insurance)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(contractor, need professional indemnity insurance)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(contractor, have a for general liability insurance)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(contractor, have a down year for liability insurance)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(contractor, have a for liability insurance)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.16

Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(contractor, have a down year for general liability insurance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Salient(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need insurance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(contractor, need insurance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(builder, need insurance)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(architect, need insurance)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(contractor, need insurance) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(architect, need professional indemnity insurance)