architect: picture structural design

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
picture structural design 1.00
design 0.84
design house 0.82
design car 0.78
picture model 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(artist, picture model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(architect, picture structural design)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(artist, picture model)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(artist, picture model)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design car)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(artist, picture model) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(architect, picture structural design)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(engineer, design car)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(engineer, design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(engineer, design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(architect, picture structural design)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(architect, design house)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(architect, design house)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(architect, design house)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(architect, design house)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(architect, picture structural design)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(architect, picture structural design)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(artist, picture model)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(engineer, design)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(engineer, design car)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(artist, picture model)