engineer: design car

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36
, biologist
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
design car 1.00
design 0.91
design house 0.91
picture structural design 0.78
design algorithm 0.76
fix break engine of car 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(architect, design house)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(architect, picture structural design)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(computer scientist, design algorithm)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(architect, design house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(architect, design house)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(computer scientist, design algorithm) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(computer scientist, design algorithm)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(architect, picture structural design) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(architect, picture structural design)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(engineer, design car)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(engineer, design)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(engineer, fix break engine of car)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(engineer, fix break engine of car)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(engineer, fix break engine of car)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(engineer, design)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(engineer, fix break engine of car)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(engineer, design)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design car)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(engineer, design car)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(architect, design house)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(architect, picture structural design)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(engineer, design car) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(computer scientist, design algorithm)