architect: use scale drawings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents contractor
Weight: 0.71
, design
Weight: 0.71
, artist
Weight: 0.64
, plan
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.62
Siblings engineer
Weight: 0.36
, builder
Weight: 0.35
, painter
Weight: 0.35
, carpenter
Weight: 0.34
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use scale drawings 1.00
own drawings 0.89
use blueprints 0.78
make blueprints 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(engineer, use blueprints)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(engineer, use blueprints)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(engineer, use blueprints)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(architect, use scale drawings)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(architect, own drawings)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(architect, own drawings)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(architect, own drawings)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(architect, use blueprints)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(architect, use blueprints)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(architect, own drawings)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(architect, make blueprints)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(architect, make blueprints)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(architect, use blueprints)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(architect, make blueprints)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(architect, make blueprints)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(architect, use blueprints)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(architect, use scale drawings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(architect, use scale drawings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(architect, use scale drawings)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(engineer, use blueprints)