arctic fox: be at earth but not on jupiter

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.68
Siblings fox
Weight: 0.39
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, owl
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at earth but not on jupiter 1.00
be at on earth 0.90
be at earth 0.87
be at surface of earth 0.83
has live body while computer do not 0.78
be beautiful but some be dangerous 0.78
be beautiful but can be deadly 0.76
be so natural and cute 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wildlife, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(animal, has live body while computer do not)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wild animal, be beautiful but can be deadly)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be beautiful but can be deadly)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be at surface of earth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(animal, has live body while computer do not)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be at surface of earth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be beautiful but can be deadly)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fox, be at earth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, be at on earth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(wildlife, be at surface of earth)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(animal, has live body while computer do not)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(wild animal, be beautiful but can be deadly)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(squirrel, be at on earth)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(squirrel, be at on earth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(fox, be at earth)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fox, be at earth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at surface of earth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wild animal, be beautiful but can be deadly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(squirrel, be at on earth)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(fox, be at earth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wildlife, be at surface of earth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(animal, has live body while computer do not)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wild animal, be beautiful but some be dangerous)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(arctic fox, be at earth but not on jupiter)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(wild animal, be beautiful but can be deadly)