arctic fox: be important to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wildlife
Weight: 0.74
, polar bear
Weight: 0.74
, predator
Weight: 0.73
, species
Weight: 0.71
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.71
, fox
Weight: 0.39
, snowy owl
Weight: 0.38
, squirrel
Weight: 0.38
, gray fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to environment 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be important to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(red fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red fox, be important to environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(arctic fox, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be important to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(arctic fox, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, be important to environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(arctic fox, be important to environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)