wildlife: be important to environment

Related concepts

Parents	land Weight: 0.62 , resource Weight: 0.58 , subject Weight: 0.56 , attraction Weight: 0.55 , topic Weight: 0.55
Siblings	geyser Weight: 0.43 , national forest Weight: 0.35 , wetland Weight: 0.35 , conservation Weight: 0.34 , animal husbandry Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to environment	1.00
be good for environment	0.93
positivaly affect environment	0.90
be important to ecosystem	0.81
adapt to rainforest environment	0.81
adapt living in forest environment	0.80
be important to life	0.80
was important to system	0.78
be important for economy	0.78
be important for development of country	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(resource, be important for development of country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(resource, be important for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(resource, be important to life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(resource, be important to life)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(resource, be important for economy)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(resource, be important for development of country)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important to life)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for development of country)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(resource, be important for economy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(resource, be important to life) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(resource, be important for development of country) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(resource, be important for economy) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to environment)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(wetland, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(wildlife, be good for environment)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to ecosystem)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(wildlife, be important to ecosystem)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to ecosystem)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to ecosystem)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt living in forest environment)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(wildlife, adapt to rainforest environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.53

Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(resource, be important to life)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(resource, be important for economy)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(resource, be important for development of country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(resource, be important to life)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(resource, be important for economy)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Typical(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(resource, be important for development of country)