wetland: be good for environment

Related concepts

Parents	ecosystem Weight: 0.73 , habitat Weight: 0.71 , land Weight: 0.65 , activity Weight: 0.54 , source Weight: 0.54
Siblings	marsh Weight: 0.71 , estuary Weight: 0.58 , grassland Weight: 0.38 , freshwater Weight: 0.36 , pond Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be good for environment	1.00
important to health of overall environment	0.85
protect environment	0.83
has quality good	0.80
provide habitats for many living things	0.77
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(pond, be good for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(wetland, be good for environment)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(wetland, be good for environment)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Plausible(source, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(wetland, be good for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(pond, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(pond, be good for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(wetland, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(wetland, protect environment)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(wetland, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(wetland, protect environment)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(wetland, protect environment)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality bad)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(wetland, has quality bad)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(wetland, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality good)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(wetland, important to health of overall environment)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(wetland, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect environment)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(wetland, provide habitats for many living things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(wetland, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(source, has quality good)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(pond, be good for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(source, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(wetland, be good for environment) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)