habitat: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality resources 0.79
is good thing 0.78
has quality loss 0.77
has quality virtues 0.77
be in great deal 0.76
has quality virtue 0.76
affect water quality in area 0.76
be good for food production 0.76
improve performance 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(charity, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(charity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(charity, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(charity, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(charity, has quality virtue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality virtue)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(charity, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be good for food production)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality loss)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(charity, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(charity, has quality virtue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(wetland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(grassland, be good for food production) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grassland, be good for food production)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(wetland, has quality loss) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality loss)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(habitat, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(habitat, has quality resources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality resources)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality resources)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(charity, is good thing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charity, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(charity, has quality virtue)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(grassland, be good for food production)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wetland, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wetland, has quality loss)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charity, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(charity, is good thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(charity, has quality virtue)