habitat: has quality resources

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, structure
Weight: 0.55
, charity
Weight: 0.55
Siblings grassland
Weight: 0.73
, wetland
Weight: 0.71
, pond
Weight: 0.65
, freshwater
Weight: 0.65
, marsh
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resources 1.00
is limited resources 0.87
has quality good 0.79
affect earths renewable resources 0.77
have rich supply 0.75
have rich supply of 0.75
be valuable resource to canadians 0.75
have rich supply of nutrients 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality resources)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality resources)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(charity, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(structure, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(structure, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(charity, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(wetland, have rich supply)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(wetland, have rich supply of)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(wetland, have rich supply of nutrients)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(structure, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality resources)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(charity, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality resources)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(wetland, have rich supply) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(wetland, have rich supply)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(wetland, have rich supply of) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(wetland, have rich supply of)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(wetland, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(wetland, have rich supply of nutrients) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(wetland, have rich supply of nutrients)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(habitat, has quality resources)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(habitat, is limited resources)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(habitat, is limited resources)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(habitat, is limited resources)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(habitat, is limited resources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(habitat, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality resources)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charity, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(wetland, have rich supply)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(wetland, have rich supply of)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wetland, have rich supply of nutrients)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(freshwater, be valuable resource to canadians)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wetland, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(charity, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(habitat, has quality resources) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(structure, has quality good)