wetland: affect water quality in area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect water quality in area 1.00
improve water quality 0.86
protect surrounding land areas 0.81
contribute to water supply 0.81
affect air 0.79
influence animal life in area 0.78
has quality good 0.76
regulate water flow 0.75
be protected in areas 0.75
be different from lakes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(habitat, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(source, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(habitat, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(source, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(habitat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wetland, improve water quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(wetland, affect air)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(wetland, affect air)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect air)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(wetland, improve water quality)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(wetland, affect air)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wetland, regulate water flow)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(wetland, regulate water flow)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(wetland, contribute to water supply)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wetland, contribute to water supply)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(wetland, influence animal life in area)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(wetland, influence animal life in area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(wetland, improve water quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wetland, regulate water flow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wetland, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(wetland, influence animal life in area)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(wetland, be different from lakes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be different from lakes)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(wetland, contribute to water supply)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wetland, influence animal life in area)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(wetland, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(wetland, improve water quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(wetland, contribute to water supply)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(wetland, regulate water flow)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(wetland, be different from lakes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(wetland, be different from lakes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(wetland, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(habitat, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(source, has quality good)