wetland: be protected in areas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ecosystem
Weight: 0.73
, habitat
Weight: 0.71
, land
Weight: 0.65
, activity
Weight: 0.54
, source
Weight: 0.54
Siblings marsh
Weight: 0.71
, estuary
Weight: 0.58
, grassland
Weight: 0.38
, freshwater
Weight: 0.36
, pond
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protected in areas 1.00
be protected in most areas 0.97
is protected 0.91
need protected 0.90
protect surrounding land areas 0.84
protect environment 0.78
need preserved 0.75
affect water quality in area 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is protected)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(estuary, need protected)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(estuary, is protected)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(estuary, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(estuary, is protected)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(grassland, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(grassland, is protected)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(estuary, need protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(estuary, need protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(wetland, be protected in areas)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wetland, be protected in most areas)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in most areas)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(wetland, need protected)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need protected)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(wetland, be protected in most areas)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(wetland, need protected)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(wetland, protect environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wetland, need preserved)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(wetland, protect surrounding land areas)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(wetland, need preserved)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wetland, need preserved)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(wetland, protect environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(wetland, protect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wetland, protect environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(wetland, affect water quality in area)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, need protected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(wetland, need preserved)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(wetland, be protected in most areas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(wetland, affect water quality in area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(wetland, be protected in areas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(estuary, is protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(grassland, is protected)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be protected in areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(estuary, need protected)