conservation: be important to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.62
, topic
Weight: 0.60
, strategy
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, ecology
Weight: 0.34
, wildlife
Weight: 0.34
, recycling
Weight: 0.33
, animal husbandry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to environment 1.00
be good for environment 0.93
be important in current environment 0.93
be important in global environment 0.91
be better for environment 0.90
be beneficial to environment 0.90
affect environment 0.90
positivaly affect environment 0.90
help environment 0.90
be bad for environment 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be better for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be important to environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be beneficial to environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, help environment)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to environment)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(conservation, be important to environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recycling, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(recycling, be important to environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(wildlife, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(recycling, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, affect environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(recycling, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(recycling, help environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(wildlife, positivaly affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(biodiversity, be beneficial to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be beneficial to environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be good for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(wildlife, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(biodiversity, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(recycling, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(recycling, be better for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(conservation, be important to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(conservation, be important to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, affect environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(wildlife, positivaly affect environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(recycling, help environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be beneficial to environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(recycling, be important to environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(wildlife, be important to environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wildlife, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(recycling, be better for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(conservation, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)