strategy: be important in global environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in global environment 1.00
be important in current global environment 0.97
be important in environment 0.92
be important in current environment 0.90
has state environment 0.84
affect global financial stability 0.82
affect global stability 0.82
be important in business 0.78
be important to business 0.78
really is important to business 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(objective, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(policy, affect global financial stability)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(policy, affect global financial stability)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(objective, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(objective, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important to business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(policy, affect global financial stability)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(marketing, has state environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(marketing, really is important to business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(policy, affect global financial stability)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(objective, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(marketing, has state environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(marketing, has state environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(planning, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(marketing, really is important to business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(marketing, really is important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in global environment)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(strategy, be important to business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(policy, affect global financial stability)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(marketing, has state environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(marketing, really is important to business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(planning, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(policy, affect global financial stability)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important in business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important to business)