strategy: be important in current environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in current environment 1.00
be important in current global environment 0.95
be important in environment 0.93
be important in global environment 0.90
has state environment 0.86
be important in counselling 0.80
be important in business 0.79
be important to business 0.78
be important in work 0.78
very is important in company 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(objective, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(objective, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(objective, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(objective, be important to business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(marketing, has state environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marketing, very is important in company)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important in business)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(planning, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(objective, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(objective, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(policy, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(planning, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(planning, be important to business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(marketing, has state environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(marketing, has state environment)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(planning, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(planning, be important in business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(marketing, very is important in company)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(marketing, very is important in company)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(framework, be important in counselling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in current environment)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in current global environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in global environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(strategy, be important to business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important to business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(planning, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(marketing, has state environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(planning, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(marketing, very is important in company)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(framework, be important in counselling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important in business)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strategy, be important in current environment)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(objective, be important to business)