recycling: be good for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents program
Weight: 0.65
, service
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, project
Weight: 0.60
Siblings landfill
Weight: 0.35
, trash
Weight: 0.34
, garbage can
Weight: 0.34
, garbage
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for environment 1.00
be better for environment 0.96
be for environment 0.95
be in environment 0.93
be important to environment 0.93
be on environment 0.92
help environment 0.89
affect environment 0.87
hurt environment 0.84
minimise impact on environment 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(landfill, help environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(landfill, be good for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(landfill, help environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(landfill, help environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(garbage, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(garbage, affect environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(trash, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(trash, affect environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(recycling, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(recycling, be in environment)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, be on environment)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(recycling, be for environment)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(recycling, help environment)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, affect environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(recycling, be on environment)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, be in environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be better for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(recycling, be for environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(recycling, be in environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(recycling, be on environment)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(recycling, be for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(recycling, help environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, affect environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(recycling, be better for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(recycling, be important to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(recycling, help environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be important to environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(recycling, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(recycling, hurt environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be in environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(recycling, be better for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(recycling, be important to environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be on environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(recycling, be better for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(recycling, be important to environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, help environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, affect environment)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(recycling, hurt environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(garbage, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(trash, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(landfill, affect environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(landfill, help environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(landfill, be good for environment)