landfill: be good for environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.63
, facility
Weight: 0.58
, source
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.54
Siblings recycling
Weight: 0.35
, chemical plant
Weight: 0.34
, water plant
Weight: 0.34
, construction site
Weight: 0.33
, nuclear power plant
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for environment 1.00
be bad for environment 0.97
be better for environment 0.96
be for environment 0.95
be in environment 0.93
be important to environment 0.93
be on environment 0.92
help environment 0.89
affect environment 0.87
hurt environment 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be better for environment)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be important to environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be for environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(nuclear power plant, affect environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be in environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, be on environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, help environment)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(recycling, affect environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(recycling, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(recycling, be good for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(recycling, be for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(recycling, be for environment)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(recycling, be in environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, be in environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(recycling, be on environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(recycling, be on environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(recycling, be important to environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(recycling, be important to environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(recycling, be better for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(recycling, be better for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(recycling, help environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(recycling, help environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(recycling, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(recycling, affect environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(nuclear power plant, affect environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(nuclear power plant, affect environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(recycling, hurt environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(recycling, hurt environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(landfill, be good for environment)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(landfill, affect environment)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(landfill, help environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(landfill, help environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(landfill, affect environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(landfill, affect environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(landfill, affect environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(landfill, help environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(landfill, be bad for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(landfill, help environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(landfill, be good for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(recycling, be in environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, be on environment)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(recycling, help environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(recycling, affect environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(recycling, be for environment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, affect environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be bad for environment)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(recycling, be important to environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(recycling, be good for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(recycling, be better for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(recycling, hurt environment)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(landfill, be good for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(nuclear power plant, be good for environment)